Week 2 report · Sat, Sep 12 · 2026 Week 2FCS opponent · display only
Mercyhurst
0–3 · unrated
7–70Final
New Mexico
4–1 · Ours #46 enteringOur rank going into this game, from the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
SpreadOur last pregame odds pull, usually inside the hour before kickoff. A median of the books we track, not a sharp close.UNM −42.5oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. −38.1 · UNM covered by 20.5
TotalOur last pregame odds pull, usually inside the hour before kickoff. A median of the books we track, not a sharp close.—
FCS opponent · display onlyFCS opponents are modeled by tier. No pick, no probability, never graded.
Quarterbacksthis game
Anthony Wolter
9/20 · 111 yards
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback (passes and sacks) in this game. The percentile is among every 2026 FBS quarterback game with 10+ dropbacks.
- −0.44
- Comp %
- 45.0
- TD
- 1
- Turnovers
- 33 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 3
Replaced 5304132 in Q1
Toa Fa'avae3/9 · 91 yards
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback (passes and sacks) in this game. The percentile is among every 2026 FBS quarterback game with 10+ dropbacks.
- −0.399th pct
- Comp %
- 33.3
- TD
- 1
- Turnovers
- 00 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 2
Relieved in Q1 by Luke Moga
No 2026 stats for Mercyhurst (FCS), so the matchup and team-stat tables are left off.
Season so far
Mercyhurst0–3
L
at New Mexico State14–51missed +29
at New Mexico State14–51missed +29Lat New Mexico7–70missed +42.5
at New Mexico7–70missed +42.5L
at Western Kentucky7–52missed +40
at Western Kentucky7–52missed +40New Mexico4–1 · 133rd-hardest schedule
W
vs Central Michigan38–7covered −11QB change mid-game
vs Central Michigan38–7covered −11QB change mid-gameWvs Mercyhurst70–7covered −42.5
L
at Oklahoma6–14covered +21
at Oklahoma6–14covered +21Wat New Mexico State42–18covered −11.5
at New Mexico State42–18covered −11.5W
vs UTEP61–7covered −23.5
vs UTEP61–7covered −23.5Model cfb_best · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Sep 12, 3:05 PM EDT · froze at kickoff and graded as-is