Week 3 report · Sat, Sep 19 · 2026 Week 3

Virginia Tech
4–2 · Ours #42 enteringOur rank going into this game, from the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
35–26FinalWe had VT 24 – MD 30

Maryland
2–4 · Ours #39 enteringOur rank going into this game, from the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceOur odds before kickoff: how often each team won outright when we played the game out thousands of times from our line.
MD 64%VT won
MD 64%VT wonSpreadOur last pregame odds pull, usually inside the hour before kickoff. A median of the books we track, not a sharp close. First seen at VT −3.VT −2.5oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. +5.8 · VT covered by 6.5
TotalOur last pregame odds pull, usually inside the hour before kickoff. A median of the books we track, not a sharp close. Our total was 54.6.53.5final 61 · over by 7.5
Our callThe side our number took at the early-week line, graded at that line. Line value is how far the market moved toward it by the last capture before kickoff.
MD +3Lbeat the close by 0.5
MD +3Lbeat the close by 0.5Quarterbacksthis game

Ethan Grunkemeyer31/39 · 314 yards
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback (passes and sacks) in this game. The percentile is among every 2026 FBS quarterback game with 10+ dropbacks.
- +0.5084th pct
- Comp %
- 79.5
- TD
- 3
- Turnovers
- 00 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 1

Malik Washington30/43 · 359 yards
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback (passes and sacks) in this game. The percentile is among every 2026 FBS quarterback game with 10+ dropbacks.
- +0.4379th pct
- Comp %
- 69.8
- TD
- 4
- Turnovers
- 00 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 2
The matchupthis game · ▲▼ better or worse than the unit's usual · percentile vs every 2026 team game
Virginia Techoffense | Played like VT +1.5Fitted from non-garbage efficiency; describes how the game was played, not who deserved it. | defenseMaryland![]() | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 82nd | 52.0%▲9.7 | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that kept the offense on schedule, outside garbage time. | 52.0%▼8.9 | 19th |
| 85th | +0.34▲0.35 | EPA / playEPA/playExpected points added per play, outside garbage time. | +0.34▼0.31 | 16th |
| 86th | +0.50▲0.51 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback, outside garbage time. | +0.50▼0.68 | 14th |
| 67th | +0.17▲0.20 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run, outside garbage time. | +0.17▲0.07 | 33rd |
| 79th | 0▲0.8 | TurnoversTurnoversInterceptions and lost fumbles: giveaways for the offense, takeaways for the defense. | 0▼1.3 | 21st |
Marylandoffense | defenseVirginia Tech![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75th | 49.2%▲16.7 | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that kept the offense on schedule, outside garbage time. | 49.2%▼13.3 | 26th |
| 81st | +0.30▲0.48 | EPA / playEPA/playExpected points added per play, outside garbage time. | +0.30▼0.28 | 20th |
| 81st | +0.41▲0.66 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback, outside garbage time. | +0.41▼0.46 | 19th |
| 50th | +0.04▲0.11 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run, outside garbage time. | +0.04▲0.02 | 50th |
| 79th | 0▲1.5 | TurnoversTurnoversInterceptions and lost fumbles: giveaways for the offense, takeaways for the defense. | 0▼0.5 | 21st |
Team statsthis game · percentile vs every 2026 team game
Virginia TechVT | MarylandMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Average startWhere the team's drives started on average. | Own 2953rd | Own 2524th |
| Drives & pace | ||
| PlaysOffensive plays outside garbage time. | 7592nd | 6573rd |
| Drive pointsThe part of the final margin the offense moved the ball for (efficiency, success rate, big plays, finishing drives), in points. A margin over the opponent. | −0.748th | +0.752nd |
| Turnovers & hidden points | ||
| Penalty first downsPenalty 1st downsFirst downs the team was handed by the opponent's penalties. | 371st | 248th |
| 4th downsPoints from going for it on fourth down, against what the average team gets from the same spots. | +0.6 pts82nd | −0.4 pts28th |
| Hidden pointsPoints from outside the offense's drives: turnovers, field position, kicking, fourth downs, penalty first downs, return touchdowns and safeties. A margin over the opponent. VT +3.5: field position +1.4, 4th downs +1.2, penalty first downs +0.8. | +3.567th | −3.533rd |
Season so far
Virginia Tech4–2 · 104th-hardest schedule
Wvs VMI73–3covered −54.5
W
vs Old Dominion44–21covered −19.5
vs Old Dominion44–21covered −19.5W
at Maryland35–26covered −2.5
at Maryland35–26covered −2.5W
at Boston College21–14missed −14.5
at Boston College21–14missed −14.5L
vs Pittsburgh33–35missed −2
vs Pittsburgh33–35missed −2L
at California20–25missed −10
at California20–25missed −10
Maryland2–4 · 3rd-hardest schedule
Wvs Hampton62–0covered −45.5
W
at UConn38–14covered −11.5
at UConn38–14covered −11.5L
vs Virginia Tech26–35missed +2.5
vs Virginia Tech26–35missed +2.5L
vs UCLA3–54missed +2.5
vs UCLA3–54missed +2.5L
at Nebraska23–48missed +15
at Nebraska23–48missed +15L
at Ohio State16–45covered +31
at Ohio State16–45covered +31Model cfb_best · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Sep 19, 6:05 PM EDT · froze at kickoff and graded as-is