Duke
4–1 · Ours #38Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
16–37Our projected score
AP #3Miami
5–0 · Ours #5Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceHow often each team wins the game outright when we play it out thousands of times from our line.MIA 90%
MIA 90%SpreadThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.MIA −21oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. −21.5 · first seenThe first DraftKings or FanDuel number we captured for this game. −21
TotalThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.55.5oursOur computer's projected combined score for both teams, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. 53.4 · first seen 55.5
Our call · PassNo bet: our line and the best DraftKings or FanDuel price don't beat the bookmaker's cut on this side.MIA −21.0-112 DraftKings50% to cover · -4.6% EV
MIA −21.0-112 DraftKings50% to cover · -4.6% EVQuarterbackslast game's starter · most dropbacks in each team's last game
Walker EgetSenior · 5 starts this year
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 134 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- +0.2243rd
- Comp %
- 61.2
- TD
- 7
- Turnovers
- 11 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 1
Darian MensahJunior · 5 starts this year
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 134 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- +0.425th
- Comp %
- 84.1
- TD
- 15
- Turnovers
- 00 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 4
The matchupeach offense against the defense it faces · FBS rank in the colored cell
| Miamioffense | Offense edge · 4 of 5 | defenseDuke | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd | +0.32 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.01 | 57th |
| 1st | 57.4% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.6%. | 38.9% | 50th |
| 3rd | +0.44 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.10. | +0.07 | 81st |
| 18th | +0.20 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | −0.07 | 30th |
| 25th | 15.2% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.9%. | 8.7% | 13th |
| Dukeoffense | Defense edge · 3 of 5 | defenseMiami | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th | +0.21 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.09. | −0.08 | 28th |
| 75th | 42.7% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.6%. | 37.6% | 37th |
| 34th | +0.24 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.10. | +0.05 | 75th |
| 26th | +0.18 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | −0.38 | 1st |
| 29th | 14.9% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.9%. | 9.0% | 20th |
Team stats
| MiamiMIA | DukeDUKE | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Special teamsSpecial teams expected points added per game. | +0.469th | +0.860th |
| Field positionAverage starting field position against the opponent's, in yards. | +0.567th | +3.934th |
| Drives & pace | ||
| Scoring chancesShare of drives that reach the opponent's 40. | 63%13th | 60%22nd |
| Points per chancePoints scored per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 5.672nd | 4.8718th |
| Time of possession | 30:3638th | 33:184th |
| Plays per game | 6756th | 7028th |
| Turnovers & havoc | ||
| Turnover margin | +3 | +2 |
| Giveaways – takeaways | 3 – 6 | 4 – 6 |
| Havoc rateShare of defensive plays with a sack, tackle for loss, interception or forced fumble. | 10.0%47th | 7.5%106th |
Season so far
Duke4–1 · 102nd-hardest schedule
W
vs Tulane17–3covered −9
vs Tulane17–3covered −9W
at Illinois31–27covered +6.5
at Illinois31–27covered +6.5W
vs Stanford35–7covered −10
vs Stanford35–7covered −10Wvs William & Mary62–7covered −43.5
L
at Georgia Tech25–28missed −4.5
at Georgia Tech25–28missed −4.5Miami5–0 · 95th-hardest schedule
Wat Stanford45–6covered −24.5
at Stanford45–6covered −24.5Wvs Florida A&M77–7covered −59.5
W
at Wake Forest33–20missed −20
at Wake Forest33–20missed −20W
vs Central Michigan52–3covered −41
vs Central Michigan52–3covered −41W
at Clemson41–13covered −14
at Clemson41–13covered −14Model cfb_scratch · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Oct 13, 7:26 AM EDT · freezes at kickoff and grades as-is