Week 1 report · Thu, Sep 3 · 2026 Week 1in trend: Weeks 0, 1 and 2 go under

UAB
3–3 · Ours #124 enteringOur rank going into this game, from the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
23–42FinalWe had UAB 22 – ILL 35

Illinois
3–3 · Ours #44 enteringOur rank going into this game, from the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceOur odds before kickoff: how often each team won outright when we played the game out thousands of times from our line.
ILL 77%ILL won
ILL 77%ILL wonSpreadOur last pregame odds pull, usually inside the hour before kickoff. A median of the books we track, not a sharp close. First seen at ILL −28.5.ILL −25.5oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. −12.7 · UAB covered by 6.5
TotalOur last pregame odds pull, usually inside the hour before kickoff. A median of the books we track, not a sharp close. Our total was 57.4.54.5final 65 · over by 10.5
Our callThe side our number took at the early-week line, graded at that line. Line value is how far the market moved toward it by the last capture before kickoff.
UAB +28.5Wbeat the close by 3.0
UAB +28.5Wbeat the close by 3.0Quarterbacksthis game

Ryder Burton18/30 · 219 yards
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback (passes and sacks) in this game. The percentile is among every 2026 FBS quarterback game with 10+ dropbacks.
- +0.4278th pct
- Comp %
- 60.0
- TD
- 1
- Turnovers
- 00 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 1

Katin Houser13/17 · 182 yards
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback (passes and sacks) in this game. The percentile is among every 2026 FBS quarterback game with 10+ dropbacks.
- +0.8897th pct
- Comp %
- 76.5
- TD
- 3
- Turnovers
- 00 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 0
The matchupthis game · ▲▼ better or worse than the unit's usual · percentile vs every 2026 team game
UABoffense | Played like ILL +11.8Fitted from non-garbage efficiency; describes how the game was played, not who deserved it. | defenseIllinois![]() | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53rd | 42.4%▲1.5 | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that kept the offense on schedule, outside garbage time. | 42.4%▲7.3 | 47th |
| 77th | +0.27▲0.27 | EPA / playEPA/playExpected points added per play, outside garbage time. | +0.27▲0.05 | 23rd |
| 73rd | +0.31▲0.48 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback, outside garbage time. | +0.31▲0.24 | 27th |
| 78th | +0.24▲0.19 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run, outside garbage time. | +0.24▼0.14 | 22nd |
| 41st | 1 | TurnoversTurnoversInterceptions and lost fumbles: giveaways for the offense, takeaways for the defense. | 1▲0.5 | 59th |
Illinoisoffense | defenseUAB![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88th | 55.8%▲8.9 | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that kept the offense on schedule, outside garbage time. | 55.8%▼10.6 | 12th |
| 92nd | +0.44▲0.31 | EPA / playEPA/playExpected points added per play, outside garbage time. | +0.44▼0.40 | 8th |
| 97th | +0.88▲0.67 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback, outside garbage time. | +0.88▼1.17 | 3rd |
| 66th | +0.15▲0.10 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run, outside garbage time. | +0.15▲0.04 | 34th |
| 79th | 0▲0.8 | TurnoversTurnoversInterceptions and lost fumbles: giveaways for the offense, takeaways for the defense. | 0▼0.5 | 21st |
Team statsthis game · percentile vs every 2026 team game
UABUAB | IllinoisILL | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Average startWhere the team's drives started on average. | Own 3480th | Own 2953rd |
| Kicking vs expectedKickingPoints from field goals and extra points against what an average kicker makes from the same spots. | +1.0 pts75th | 0.0 pts39th |
| Drives & pace | ||
| PlaysOffensive plays outside garbage time. | 6675th | 4325th |
| Drive pointsThe part of the final margin the offense moved the ball for (efficiency, success rate, big plays, finishing drives), in points. A margin over the opponent. | −19.710th | +19.790th |
| Turnovers & hidden points | ||
| Penalty first downsPenalty 1st downsFirst downs the team was handed by the opponent's penalties. | 248th | 248th |
| 4th downsPoints from going for it on fourth down, against what the average team gets from the same spots. | +1.5 pts99th | −0.4 pts26th |
| Return touchdownsReturn TDsDefensive and special-teams touchdowns. | 042nd | 192nd |
| Hidden pointsPoints from outside the offense's drives: turnovers, field position, kicking, fourth downs, penalty first downs, return touchdowns and safeties. A margin over the opponent. ILL +1.9: turnovers +2.6, field position −1.7, kicking −0.7, 4th downs −2.5, return touchdowns +4.2. | −1.939th | +1.961st |
Season so far
UAB3–3 · 112th-hardest schedule
L
at Illinois23–42covered +25.5
at Illinois23–42covered +25.5W
vs UL Monroe26–20missed −9.5
vs UL Monroe26–20missed −9.5L
at Louisiana14–21push +7
at Louisiana14–21push +7W
vs Navy24–20covered +6.5
vs Navy24–20covered +6.5Wvs Samford33–14missed −31
L
at Memphis13–38missed +14.5
at Memphis13–38missed +14.5
Illinois3–3 · 38th-hardest schedule
W
vs UAB42–23missed −25.5
vs UAB42–23missed −25.5L
vs Duke27–31missed −6.5
vs Duke27–31missed −6.5Wvs Southern Illinois48–10covered −35.5
L
at Ohio State19–42covered +26
at Ohio State19–42covered +26L
vs Purdue17–24missed −9.5
vs Purdue17–24missed −9.5W
at Michigan State38–37missed −2.5
at Michigan State38–37missed −2.5Model cfb_best · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Sep 3, 7:05 PM EDT · froze at kickoff and graded as-is