Charlotte
0–6 · Ours #138Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
14–36Our projected score
Tulsa
3–3 · Ours #99Our rank on the rankings page. The board's line comes from the betting model, which sees more than this one number.
Win chanceHow often each team wins the game outright when we play it out thousands of times from our line.TLSA 91%
TLSA 91%SpreadThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's point spread for this game, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. Read it like a betting line: −7 means we have that team winning by 7. TLSA −22.2
TotalThe betting line right now: the middle of the sportsbooks we track, updated through the day.—oursOur computer's projected combined score for both teams, built from team stats, not from the betting odds. 49.9
Our call · No priceNeither DraftKings nor FanDuel is offering our side at our number right now, so there is no price to judge.—
Quarterbackslast game's starter · most dropbacks in each team's last game
Conner HarrellSenior · 1 start this year · 2 relief appearances
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 134 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- −0.25
- Comp %
- 68.3
- TD
- 1
- Turnovers
- 22 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 4
New starter last game
Baylor HayesSophomore · 4 starts this year
- EPA / dropbackExpected points added per dropback: passes, sacks (college play-by-play logs scrambles as runs). The rank is among the 134 FBS passers with 15+ dropbacks per team game.
- 0.00100th
- Comp %
- 60.6
- TD
- 5
- Turnovers
- 11 INT · 0 fum
- Sacked
- 5
The matchupeach offense against the defense it faces · FBS rank in the colored cell
| Tulsaoffense | Offense edge · 4 of 5 | defenseCharlotte | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70th | +0.09 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.19 | 126th |
| 124th | 37.4% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.6%. | 48.4% | 132nd |
| 107th | −0.03 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.10. | +0.33 | 135th |
| 10th | +0.23 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | +0.07 | 85th |
| 119th | 9.9% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.9%. | 12.2% | 85th |
| Charlotteoffense | Defense edge · 4 of 5 | defenseTulsa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 121st | −0.05 | Overall efficiencyEfficiencyExpected points added per play. FBS average: +0.09. | +0.04 | 67th |
| 132nd | 34.5% | Success rateSuccessShare of plays that keep the offense on schedule. FBS average: 43.6%. | 40.3% | 66th |
| 121st | −0.10 | PassingPassingExpected points added per dropback. FBS average: +0.10. | +0.08 | 85th |
| 92nd | +0.03 | RushingRushingExpected points added per run. FBS average: +0.07. | −0.01 | 58th |
| 52nd | 13.5% | Big playsBig playsShare of plays gaining 20+ yards passing or 10+ rushing. FBS average: 12.9%. | 11.5% | 67th |
Team stats
| TulsaTLSA | CharlotteCLT | |
|---|---|---|
| Special teams & field position | ||
| Special teamsSpecial teams expected points added per game. | −0.282nd | −1.8112th |
| Field positionAverage starting field position against the opponent's, in yards. | +1.361st | −8.4135th |
| Drives & pace | ||
| Scoring chancesShare of drives that reach the opponent's 40. | 44%109th | 36%133rd |
| Points per chancePoints scored per drive that reaches the opponent's 40. | 4.3748th | 2.71131st |
| Time of possession | 26:30107th | 26:36105th |
| Plays per game | 6664th | 55136th |
| Turnovers & havoc | ||
| Turnover margin | +7 | −11 |
| Giveaways – takeaways | 7 – 14 | 15 – 4 |
| Havoc rateShare of defensive plays with a sack, tackle for loss, interception or forced fumble. | 7.3%110th | 8.9%74th |
Season so far
Charlotte0–6 · 43rd-hardest schedule
Lvs The Citadel41–43missed −20.5
L
at Ole Miss9–41covered +45
at Ole Miss9–41covered +45L
at App State21–26covered +17.5
at App State21–26covered +17.5L
vs Louisiana7–34missed +9.5
vs Louisiana7–34missed +9.5L
vs Memphis8–59missed +20.5
vs Memphis8–59missed +20.5L
at North Texas10–50missed +28
at North Texas10–50missed +28Tulsa3–3 · 97th-hardest schedule
W
vs Oklahoma State24–10covered +13
vs Oklahoma State24–10covered +13W
at Sam Houston23–17missed −12.5
at Sam Houston23–17missed −12.5Wvs East Texas A&M42–0covered −41
L
at Arkansas6–34missed +7
at Arkansas6–34missed +7Lvs North Texas44–45covered +2.5
vs North Texas44–45covered +2.5L
at Navy26–34missed +3
at Navy26–34missed +3Model cfb_scratch · uncertainty ±15.5 · run Oct 13, 7:26 AM EDT · freezes at kickoff and grades as-is