Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Purdue

1–10 FBS · Big Ten · 2025
Rating
−7.0
Rank
99
Résumé
100
Our picks
6–5
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
2.1expected wins · finished 110
Bowl (6+)0%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

1–10 against 2.1 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 2.4.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 99thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
03
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−1.1
110 vs 2.1
One-score games flipped
47
what-if record
Turnover margin
−5
expected −8.5

Luck: −1.4 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 99th · −7.0 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency0.065th
Offense play value−0.680th
Defense efficiency−2.5119th
Defense play value−2.8110th
Drive finishing−0.596th
Field position−0.695th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.0122nd
Third-down conversion+0.039th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −3.3 pts/game to results — ran cold; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−0.8
95th
Havoc rate
9.8%
89th
Rush rate over expected
−4.2%
102nd · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForcePURgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Purdueoff −0.10 117thdef +0.26 133rd

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
65against the closing line
Pick was the favorite54
Pick was the dog11
Home / away side32 / 33
Average gap to the close+5.2 pts
Our line beat the close5 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+9.52nd
Full season+9.52nd

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Aug 30Ball StatePUR −10.2−16.5W 31–096LOSS
Sat, Sep 13USCPUR +26.3+20.5L 17–338LOSS
Sat, Sep 20at Notre DamePUR +41.9+24.5L 30–5637WIN
Sat, Oct 4IllinoisPUR +10.3+7.0L 27–4350WIN
Sat, Oct 11at MinnesotaPUR +11.5+7.5L 20–2757LOSS
Sat, Oct 18at NorthwesternPUR +8.7+3.0L 0–1930WIN
Sat, Oct 25RutgersPUR +4.9−2.5L 24–2731WIN
Sat, Nov 1at MichiganPUR +21.7+21.0L 16–2133LOSS
Sat, Nov 8Ohio StatePUR +29.8+29.5L 10–349LOSS
Sat, Nov 15at WashingtonPUR +18.8+14.5L 13–491WIN
Fri, Nov 28IndianaPUR +30.1+28.5L 3–5614WIN

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.