LockSZN
Aug 28, 12:06 PM EDTupdated
Rankings · College · 2026 current page

UCLA

3–9 FBS · Big Ten · 2025
Rating
−5.7
Rank
91
Résumé
83
Our picks
7–5
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
3.4expected wins · finished 3–9
Bowl (6+)6%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

3–9 against 3.4 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 3.4.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 91stFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
2–3
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−0.4
3–9 vs 3.4
One-score games flipped
4–8
what-if record
Turnover margin
−8
expected −6.5

Luck: −0.4 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 102nd · −7.3 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−0.370th
Offense play value−0.270th
Defense efficiency−3.4128th
Defense play value−1.892nd
Drive finishing−0.388th
Field position−1.2125th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security+0.040th
Third-down conversion+0.011th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added +0.0 pts/game to results; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
+0.3
58th
Havoc rate
9.7%
91st
Rush rate over expected
−0.5%
64th · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceUCLAgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
UCLAoff −0.07 112thdef +0.12 109th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
7–5against the closing line
Pick was the favorite2–3
Pick was the dog5–2
Home / away side2–3 / 5–2
Average gap to the close+5.3 pts
Our line beat the close6 of 12

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+9.43rd
Full season+9.43rd

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Aug 30UtahUCLA −6.9+6.5L 10–4320LOSS
Sat, Sep 6at UNLVUCLA +7.5−2.5L 23–3034WIN
Fri, Sep 12New MexicoUCLA −21.6−15.5L 10–3528LOSS
Sat, Sep 27at NorthwesternUCLA +4.4+6.0L 14–1747WIN
Sat, Oct 4Penn StateUCLA +28.8+24.5W 42–3760LOSS
Sat, Oct 11at Michigan StateUCLA +6.8+7.0W 38–1388WIN
Sat, Oct 18MarylandUCLA +1.3−4.0W 20–1754WIN
Sat, Oct 25at IndianaUCLA +25.7+26.5L 6–562LOSS
Sat, Nov 8NebraskaUCLA +10.9−1.5L 21–2827WIN
Sat, Nov 15at Ohio StateUCLA +34.5+33.5L 10–486WIN
Sat, Nov 22WashingtonUCLA +14.9+10.5L 14–4841WIN
Sat, Nov 29at USCUCLA +25.3+21.5L 10–2943LOSS

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.