LockSZN
Aug 28, 12:06 PM EDTupdated
Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Utah

10–2 FBS · Big 12 · 2025
Rating
+19.4
Rank
7
Résumé
13
Our picks
3–8
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
7.9expected wins · finished 10–2
Bowl (6+)94%
9+ wins36%
11+ wins4%

10–2 against 7.9 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 9.4.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 7thAP 14thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
1–1
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
+2.1
10–2 vs 7.9
One-score games flipped
10–2
what-if record
Turnover margin
+5
expected +3.0

Luck: +0.6 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 10th · +14.2 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency+4.19th
Offense play value+5.98th
Defense efficiency+2.029th
Defense play value+0.262nd
Drive finishing+1.95th
Field position+0.251st
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security+0.04th
Third-down conversion−0.0127th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added +3.6 pts/game to results — ran hot; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
+1.4
22nd
Havoc rate
12.9%
14th
Rush rate over expected
+2.8%
36th · run-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLASouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceUTAHgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Utahoff +0.22 7thdef −0.02 42nd

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
3–8against the closing line
Pick was the favorite0–0
Pick was the dog3–8
Home / away side1–4 / 2–4
Average gap to the close+6.1 pts
Our line beat the close3 of 12

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+1.663rd
Full season+1.663rd

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Aug 30at UCLAUTAH +6.9−6.5W 43–1080LOSS
Sat, Sep 13at WyomingUTAH −10.5−24.5W 31–684LOSS
Sat, Sep 20Texas TechUTAH PK−3.5L 10–3439WIN
Sat, Sep 27at West VirginiaUTAH −9.9−13.5W 48–1494LOSS
Sat, Oct 11Arizona StateUTAH −2.1−9.5W 42–1078LOSS
Sat, Oct 18at BYUUTAH +0.7−4.0L 21–2447WIN
Sat, Oct 25ColoradoUTAH −9.8−14.0W 53–796LOSS
Sat, Nov 1CincinnatiUTAH −7.9−11.5W 45–1462LOSS
Sat, Nov 15at BaylorUTAH −4.3−9.5W 55–2875LOSS
Sat, Nov 22Kansas StateUTAH −10.5−17.5W 51–4747WIN
Fri, Nov 28at KansasUTAH −11.9−10.0W 31–2166PUSH
Wed, Dec 31NebraskaUTAH −13.1−13.5W 44–2267LOSS

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.