Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Kentucky

4–7 FBS · SEC · 2025
Rating
−0.7
Rank
72
Résumé
59
Our picks
8–3
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
3.9expected wins · finished 47
Bowl (6+)13%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

4–7 against 3.9 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 4.3.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 72ndFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
22
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
+0.1
47 vs 3.9
One-score games flipped
47
what-if record
Turnover margin
−5
expected −2.5

Luck: −0.3 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 58th · +2.3 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency+1.139th
Offense play value−0.167th
Defense efficiency−0.572nd
Defense play value+1.348th
Drive finishing+0.063rd
Field position+0.440th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.0122nd
Third-down conversion0.060th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −2.5 pts/game to results — ran cold; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−0.5
85th
Havoc rate
11.6%
43rd
Rush rate over expected
+0.6%
54th · run-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceUKgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Kentuckyoff −0.07 113thdef +0.04 72nd

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
83against the closing line
Pick was the favorite32
Pick was the dog51
Home / away side40 / 43
Average gap to the close+2.8 pts
Our line beat the close6 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+7.110th
Full season+7.110th

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Aug 30ToledoUK −8.0−10.0W 24–1663WIN
Sat, Sep 6Ole MissUK +13.4+7.5L 23–3037LOSS
Sat, Sep 13Eastern MichiganUK −22.8−26.5W 48–2383WIN
Sat, Sep 27at South CarolinaUK +5.1+5.5L 13–3517LOSS
Sat, Oct 4at GeorgiaUK +23.4+19.5L 14–3525WIN
Sat, Oct 18TexasUK +13.3+12.5L 13–1664LOSS
Sat, Oct 25TennesseeUK +7.6+7.5L 34–5620WIN
Sat, Nov 1at AuburnUK +10.7+11.5W 10–348WIN
Sat, Nov 8FloridaUK +2.6+4.5W 38–779WIN
Sat, Nov 22at VanderbiltUK +10.8+7.0L 17–454WIN
Sat, Nov 29at LouisvilleUK +5.8−1.5L 0–4112WIN

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.