Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Northern Illinois

2–9 FBS · Mountain West · 2025
Rating
−12.0
Rank
120
Résumé
130
Our picks
5–6
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
5.3expected wins · finished 29
Bowl (6+)46%
9+ wins1%
11+ wins0%

2–9 against 5.3 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 3.5.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 120thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
03
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−3.3
29 vs 5.3
One-score games flipped
56
what-if record
Turnover margin
−1
expected +2.0

Luck: −1.5 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 131st · −16.6 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−4.7132nd
Offense play value−5.0125th
Defense efficiency−3.1123rd
Defense play value−2.094th
Drive finishing−1.3122nd
Field position−0.699th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security+0.021st
Third-down conversion0.060th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added +1.1 pts/game to results; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
+1.2
27th
Havoc rate
7.6%
129th
Rush rate over expected
+15.1%
5th · run-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceNIUgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Northern Illinoisoff −0.10 119thdef +0.08 87th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
56against the closing line
Pick was the favorite31
Pick was the dog25
Home / away side34 / 22
Average gap to the close+4.7 pts
Our line beat the close5 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played−5.5120th
Full season−5.5120th

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Fri, Sep 5at MarylandNIU +12.5+16.5L 9–2037WIN
Sat, Sep 20at Mississippi StateNIU +15.9+23.5L 10–3823LOSS
Sat, Sep 27San Diego StateNIU −4.0+1.5L 3–647LOSS
Sat, Oct 4Miami (OH)NIU +2.8+4.5L 14–2533LOSS
Sat, Oct 11at Eastern MichiganNIU PK−1.5L 10–1637WIN
Sat, Oct 18at OhioNIU +17.1+10.5L 21–488WIN
Sat, Oct 25Ball StateNIU −13.8−6.5W 21–763WIN
Wed, Nov 5at ToledoNIU +11.1+14.5L 3–425LOSS
Wed, Nov 12at MassachusettsNIU −13.5−9.5W 45–397WIN
Tue, Nov 18Western MichiganNIU +1.8+7.0L 19–3523LOSS
Fri, Nov 28Kent StateNIU −9.5−4.5L 31–3550LOSS

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.