Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Pittsburgh

7–5 FBS · ACC · 2025
Rating
+6.7
Rank
34
Résumé
42
Our picks
9–3
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
6.7expected wins · finished 75
Bowl (6+)79%
9+ wins13%
11+ wins1%

7–5 against 6.7 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 8.2.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 34thAP NRFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
13
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
+0.3
75 vs 6.7
One-score games flipped
93
what-if record
Turnover margin
0
expected −1.5

Luck: −1.2 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 30th · +7.0 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−0.783rd
Offense play value−0.782nd
Defense efficiency+3.910th
Defense play value+3.420th
Drive finishing−0.389th
Field position+1.413th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.099th
Third-down conversion+0.011th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −2.2 pts/game to results — ran cold; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−0.1
69th
Havoc rate
14.6%
5th
Rush rate over expected
−9.3%
127th · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForcePITTgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Pittsburghoff +0.03 67thdef −0.14 8th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
93against the closing line
Pick was the favorite50
Pick was the dog43
Home / away side42 / 51
Average gap to the close+3.3 pts
Our line beat the close8 of 12

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+2.650th
Full season+2.650th

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Sep 6Central MichiganPITT −21.9−21.5W 45–1774WIN
Sat, Sep 13at West VirginiaPITT −1.6−7.0L 24–3158WIN
Sat, Sep 27LouisvillePITT +6.3+3.0L 27–3432WIN
Sat, Oct 4Boston CollegePITT −3.8−7.0W 48–791LOSS
Sat, Oct 11at Florida StatePITT +2.3+10.5W 34–3166WIN
Sat, Oct 18at SyracusePITT −7.4−9.5W 30–1352LOSS
Sat, Oct 25NC StatePITT −5.1−4.5W 53–3450WIN
Sat, Nov 1at StanfordPITT −17.9−13.5W 35–2078WIN
Sat, Nov 15Notre DamePITT +15.7+12.5L 15–3732WIN
Sat, Nov 22at Georgia TechPITT +1.6+2.5W 42–2889WIN
Sat, Nov 29MiamiPITT +5.3+6.5L 7–3839LOSS
Sat, Dec 27at East CarolinaPITT −6.5−12.5L 17–2353WIN

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.