Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Stanford

4–8 FBS · ACC · 2025
Rating
−6.1
Rank
94
Résumé
88
Our picks
5–7
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
2.8expected wins · finished 48
Bowl (6+)3%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

4–8 against 2.8 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 2.5.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 94thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
22
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
+1.2
48 vs 2.8
One-score games flipped
48
what-if record
Turnover margin
−3
expected −9.5

Luck: +1.5 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 109th · −8.4 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−2.4112th
Offense play value−3.0110th
Defense efficiency−0.163rd
Defense play value−0.777th
Drive finishing−0.173rd
Field position−2.0134th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.099th
Third-down conversion−0.0116th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −0.3 pts/game to results; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−2.1
125th
Havoc rate
7.8%
125th
Rush rate over expected
−2.0%
81st · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceSTANgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Stanfordoff −0.16 127thdef +0.09 90th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
57against the closing line
Pick was the favorite12
Pick was the dog45
Home / away side31 / 26
Average gap to the close+4.1 pts
Our line beat the close4 of 12

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+4.432nd
Full season+4.432nd

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Aug 23at Hawai'iSTAN −3.8+1.5L 20–2348LOSS
Sat, Sep 6at BYUSTAN +16.4+20.5L 3–2739LOSS
Sat, Sep 13Boston CollegeSTAN +6.7+14.0W 30–2068WIN
Sat, Sep 20at VirginiaSTAN +6.1+16.5L 20–4839LOSS
Sat, Sep 27San José StateSTAN PK−3.0W 30–2948WIN
Sat, Oct 11at SMUSTAN +19.2+19.5L 10–3413LOSS
Sat, Oct 18Florida StateSTAN +10.3+17.5W 20–1346WIN
Sat, Oct 25at MiamiSTAN +26.1+28.5L 7–4225LOSS
Sat, Nov 1PittsburghSTAN +17.9+13.5L 20–3523WIN
Sat, Nov 8at North CarolinaSTAN +8.8+8.5L 15–2040LOSS
Sat, Nov 22CaliforniaSTAN +1.1+4.5W 31–1034WIN
Sat, Nov 29Notre DameSTAN +33.7+32.5L 20–496LOSS

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.