LockSZN
Aug 28, 12:06 PM EDTupdated
Rankings · College · 2026 current page

UL Monroe

2–9 FBS · Sun Belt · 2025
Rating
−17.3
Rank
132
Résumé
129
Our picks
4–7
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
3.0expected wins · finished 2–9
Bowl (6+)4%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

2–9 against 3.0 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 3.1.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 132ndFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
1–1
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−1.0
2–9 vs 3.0
One-score games flipped
2–9
what-if record
Turnover margin
−13
expected −7.5

Luck: −1.1 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 127th · −13.4 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−3.7125th
Offense play value−3.8115th
Defense efficiency−0.977th
Defense play value−1.993rd
Drive finishing−1.6125th
Field position−1.6130th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.099th
Third-down conversion+0.039th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −1.7 pts/game to results — ran cold; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−2.1
126th
Havoc rate
11.1%
58th
Rush rate over expected
+10.4%
9th · run-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceULMgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
UL Monroeoff −0.06 109thdef +0.11 107th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
4–7against the closing line
Pick was the favorite3–3
Pick was the dog1–4
Home / away side2–4 / 2–3
Average gap to the close+3.1 pts
Our line beat the close4 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played−3.197th
Full season−3.197th

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Sep 6at AlabamaULM +33.9+34.5L 0–7325LOSS
Sat, Sep 20at UTEPULM +8.9+5.5W 31–2580LOSS
Sat, Sep 27Arkansas StateULM PK−1.5W 28–1674LOSS
Sat, Oct 4at NorthwesternULM +14.5+12.5L 7–4242WIN
Sat, Oct 11at Coastal CarolinaULM +2.9−3.0L 8–2331WIN
Sat, Oct 18TroyULM +9.9+4.5L 14–3738WIN
Sat, Oct 25at Southern MissULM +9.5+14.0L 21–4928LOSS
Sat, Nov 1Old DominionULM +16.0+16.5L 6–311LOSS
Sat, Nov 15South AlabamaULM +10.0+4.0L 14–2616WIN
Sat, Nov 22at Texas StateULM +22.6+20.5L 14–3130LOSS
Sat, Nov 29at LouisianaULM +14.1+11.5L 27–3075LOSS

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.