LockSZN
Aug 28, 12:06 PM EDTupdated
Rankings · College · 2026 current page

UTEP

1–10 FBS · Mountain West · 2025
Rating
−14.6
Rank
128
Résumé
135
Our picks
6–5
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
4.2expected wins · finished 1–10
Bowl (6+)19%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

1–10 against 4.2 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 3.6.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 128thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
0–3
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−3.2
1–10 vs 4.2
One-score games flipped
4–7
what-if record
Turnover margin
−13
expected −11.5

Luck: −2.6 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 123rd · −11.7 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−5.6135th
Offense play value−6.3131st
Defense efficiency−0.366th
Defense play value+1.741st
Drive finishing−0.699th
Field position−0.594th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.080th
Third-down conversion0.060th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −1.0 pts/game to results; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
+0.1
65th
Havoc rate
10.5%
74th
Rush rate over expected
−2.3%
86th · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceUTEPgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
UTEPoff −0.14 125thdef −0.03 40th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
6–5against the closing line
Pick was the favorite5–2
Pick was the dog1–3
Home / away side2–3 / 4–2
Average gap to the close+3.1 pts
Our line beat the close5 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played−5.9126th
Full season−5.9126th

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Sat, Aug 30at Utah StateUTEP +7.8+3.5L 16–2823WIN
Sat, Sep 13at TexasUTEP +43.8+39.5L 10–2746LOSS
Sat, Sep 20UL MonroeUTEP −8.9−5.5L 25–3121LOSS
Sat, Sep 27Louisiana TechUTEP +8.0+3.5L 11–3049WIN
Wed, Oct 8LibertyUTEP +2.1+1.5L 8–1915WIN
Wed, Oct 15at Sam HoustonUTEP −0.6−3.5W 35–1766LOSS
Tue, Oct 28at Kennesaw StateUTEP +7.0+12.5L 20–3359LOSS
Sat, Nov 8Jacksonville StateUTEP +5.2+1.5L 27–3042WIN
Sat, Nov 15at Missouri StateUTEP +8.7+6.5L 24–3858WIN
Sat, Nov 22New Mexico StateUTEP −3.6−4.0L 31–3461WIN
Sat, Nov 29at DelawareUTEP +2.8+4.5L 31–6116LOSS

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.