Rankings · College · 2026 current page

Charlotte

0–11 FBS · American Athletic · 2025
Rating
−21.7
Rank
135
Résumé
131
Our picks
3–8
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
2.3expected wins · finished 011
Bowl (6+)1%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

0–11 against 2.3 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 0.8.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 135thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
00
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−2.3
011 vs 2.3
One-score games flipped
011
what-if record
Turnover margin
+1
expected −3.5

Luck: −0.8 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 134th · −23.0 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−4.5131st
Offense play value−7.2136th
Defense efficiency−6.2136th
Defense play value−2.095th
Drive finishing−2.4135th
Field position−0.7103rd
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.0122nd
Third-down conversion−0.080th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −2.3 pts/game to results — ran cold; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−0.2
70th
Havoc rate
6.6%
134th
Rush rate over expected
+0.5%
55th · run-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceCLTgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Charlotteoff −0.26 135thdef +0.23 131st

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
38against the closing line
Pick was the favorite12
Pick was the dog26
Home / away side07 / 31
Average gap to the close+5.4 pts
Our line beat the close2 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+1.663rd
Full season+1.663rd

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Fri, Aug 29App StateCLT +2.4+8.5L 11–3429LOSS
Sat, Sep 6North CarolinaCLT +8.6+16.5L 3–2035LOSS
Thu, Sep 18RiceCLT +1.2+1.5L 17–2818LOSS
Fri, Oct 3at South FloridaCLT +13.9+27.5L 26–545LOSS
Sat, Oct 11at ArmyCLT +17.9+17.5L 7–2417LOSS
Sat, Oct 18TempleCLT +5.4+10.0L 14–4914LOSS
Fri, Oct 24North TexasCLT +20.4+25.5L 20–5438LOSS
Sat, Nov 8at East CarolinaCLT +22.8+27.5L 22–4830WIN
Sat, Nov 15UTSACLT +19.2+16.5L 7–2838WIN
Sat, Nov 22at GeorgiaCLT +50.3+42.5L 3–352LOSS
Sat, Nov 29at TulaneCLT +24.6+30.5L 0–2710WIN

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.