Rankings · College · 2026 current page

North Carolina

3–8 FBS · ACC · 2025
Rating
−9.0
Rank
107
Résumé
109
Our picks
6–4
Expected wins · what our pregame odds said the games were worth
4.3expected wins · finished 38
Bowl (6+)22%
9+ wins0%
11+ wins0%

3–8 against 4.3 expected wins. Second-order wins — the record their play deserved — put them at 6.2.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 107thFinal

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
13
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−1.3
38 vs 4.3
One-score games flipped
56
what-if record
Turnover margin
−5
expected −1.0

Luck: −3.2 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 82nd · −3.7 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency−2.1107th
Offense play value−1.896th
Defense efficiency−0.571st
Defense play value+1.150th
Drive finishing−0.493rd
Field position+0.161st
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security−0.080th
Third-down conversion−0.080th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −0.6 pts/game to results; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
+3.5
4th
Havoc rate
10.4%
78th
Rush rate over expected
−2.3%
85th · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Michigan StateWestern MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceUNCgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
North Carolinaoff −0.05 106thdef −0.00 49th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
64against the closing line
Pick was the favorite31
Pick was the dog33
Home / away side33 / 31
Average gap to the close+3.1 pts
Our line beat the close6 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played−1.583rd
Full season−1.583rd

Model ledger

2025 · our line against every result
DateOpponentOur lineCloseResultPerformancePick
Mon, Sep 1TCUUNC +5.6+3.0L 14–4823WIN
Sat, Sep 6at CharlotteUNC −8.6−16.5W 20–366LOSS
Sat, Sep 20at UCFUNC +8.0+7.0L 9–3412WIN
Sat, Oct 4ClemsonUNC +12.8+15.5L 10–3816LOSS
Fri, Oct 17at CaliforniaUNC +2.2+7.5L 18–2140WIN
Sat, Oct 25VirginiaUNC +6.6+11.5L 16–1753WIN
Fri, Oct 31at SyracuseUNC −0.8+1.5W 27–1086WIN
Sat, Nov 8StanfordUNC −8.8−8.5W 20–1560LOSS
Sat, Nov 15at Wake ForestUNC +2.5+3.5L 12–2844LOSS
Sat, Nov 22DukeUNC +3.5+7.0L 25–3262PUSH
Sat, Nov 29at NC StateUNC +9.9+7.0L 19–4226WIN

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.