Rankings · College

Michigan State

0–0 FBS · Big Ten · 2026
Rating
−3.0
Rank
81
Résumé
Our picks
2026 preseasonRating and rank begin with last season's strength. The record, résumé, and team-performance report start fresh when games are played.View Michigan State's 2025 final page
Projected wins · our pregame odds for every game left
4.7projected wins · 12 games
Bowl (6+)36%
9+ wins7%
11+ wins1%

Preseason odds: every line starts from last season and offseason inputs, so this moves most in September. Bands come from the playoff simulation, which carries team-quality uncertainty — early-season spread is honestly wide.

Ranking by week151025Wk 0Wk 7Wk 14Wk 23
Ours 81stFinal

Playoff picture

from 10,000 season simulations
Reach title game1%
Win conference1%
Make the CFP3%
First-round bye1%
Win it all<1%
  • a CFP bid: 5% with a win vs Toledo, 1% with a loss.

Simulated from our pregame win probability for every remaining game; the CFP field is picked by a committee stand-in, so treat those odds as model-derived. Full bracket on the playoffs page.

Luck & what-ifs

2025 final
One-score record
12
decided by 8 or fewer
Wins vs expected
−0.8
38 vs 3.8
One-score games flipped
47
what-if record
Turnover margin
−3
expected −0.5

Luck: −0.6 wins versus the record their play deserved. Banked wins keep; the pace is what regresses.

ConjPWR profile

2025 final · 83rd · −3.7 pts vs avg
What repeats — the ratingvs averagepts / game
Offense efficiency+0.360th
Offense play value0.066th
Defense efficiency−1.186th
Defense play value−2.6106th
Drive finishing+0.255th
Field position−0.589th
What doesn't — luckvs averagepts / game
Ball security+0.040th
Third-down conversion+0.06th

Points per game vs an average team, opponent-adjusted and weighted by how much the factor repeats — the tagged luck factors are already discounted to near zero. Luck added −0.4 pts/game to results; in CFB that pace regresses.

Hidden game

special teams · disruption · style
Special teams EPA / game
−0.7
91st
Havoc rate
8.7%
112th
Rush rate over expected
−3.3%
97th · pass-leaning

The pieces the ConjPWR factors don't cover: kicking-game value, defensive disruption, and run/pass lean (style, not quality).

Where they sit · offense vs defensepinch or ⌘/ctrl + scroll to zoom
−0.200.00+0.20FBS averageKansas StateIowa StateKansasFresno StateWestern KentuckySam HoustonHawai'iStanfordSouth FloridaBoise StateRutgersOhioAkronWyomingNC StateEast CarolinaUCFJacksonville StateMinnesotaBuffaloCincinnatiNebraskaWisconsinMiami (OH)Western MichiganCharlotteApp StateWake ForestKennesaw StateBaylorAuburnColoradoGeorgia TechUNLVSan José StateCentral MichiganMarylandFlorida AtlanticPurdueBall StateTennesseeSyracuseSouthern MissMississippi StateOhio StateTexasTulaneNorthwesternKentuckyToledoIndianaOld DominionPenn StateNevadaFlorida StateAlabamaMassachusettsTempleGeorgiaMarshallVirginiaCoastal CarolinaTexas A&MUTSAUtah StateUTEPClemsonLSUMichiganNew MexicoUSCMissouri StateOle MissGeorgia StateLouisianaRiceTexas StateEastern MichiganGeorgia SouthernOregon StateCaliforniaArizonaWashingtonColorado StateUCLAUtahSouth CarolinaVirginia TechMiamiNotre DameNorth CarolinaTCULouisvilleJames MadisonNorthern IllinoisPittsburghFlorida InternationalIowaDukeIllinoisLibertyUConnTexas TechKent StateSMUDelawareTroyMissouriBowling GreenOregonOklahoma StateNorth TexasNavyUABMiddle TennesseeWest VirginiaFloridaArkansasArkansas StateMemphisArmySouth AlabamaHoustonVanderbiltLouisiana TechOklahomaArizona StateBoston CollegeUL MonroeNew Mexico StateTulsaBYUWashington StateSan Diego StateAir ForceMSUgood offense, good defense →Offense EPA/play →better defense →
Michigan Stateoff −0.01 89thdef +0.11 108th

Every FBS team, 2025 final. EPA is garbage-time filtered. Tap a logo for its numbers.

Pick record · our line vs the close
56against the closing line
Pick was the favorite26
Pick was the dog30
Home / away side15 / 41
Average gap to the close+2.6 pts
Our line beat the close4 of 11

Graded against the closing line, not the open. A push counts as neither.

Schedule strength

opponent rating, points vs average
Avg opponentFBS rank
Played+5.324th
Full season+5.324th

Upcoming

our line · the market · play or pass at a DK/FD price
DateOpponentOur lineMarketOur call
Fri, Sep 4ToledoMSU +1.2MSU −10.0TOL +10.0Pass
Sat, Sep 12Eastern MichiganMSU −11.8no line
Sat, Sep 19at Notre DameMSU +26.8no line
Sat, Sep 26NebraskaMSU +1.8no line
Sat, Oct 3at WisconsinMSU +3.3no line
Sat, Oct 10IllinoisMSU +2.7no line
Sat, Oct 17NorthwesternMSU PKno line
Sat, Oct 24at UCLAMSU −0.6no line
Sat, Nov 7at MichiganMSU +11.6no line
Sat, Nov 14WashingtonMSU +9.7no line
Fri, Nov 20OregonMSU +15.8no line
Sat, Nov 28at RutgersMSU +4.7no line

How to read this page

EPA/playExpected points added per play.
Success rateShare of plays gaining enough for the down.
Quality driveA drive reaching a first down inside the opponent's 40.
Points per QDFinishing — points scored per quality drive.
QD ratioOur quality drives against theirs. Game control.
RROERush rate over expected for down, distance, score and time.
Game percentileThis performance against every FBS game this season.
Expected winsOur pregame win probabilities summed — computed exactly, no simulations.
Havoc rateTFLs, sacks, passes defensed, forced fumbles per defensive snap.
Second-order winsThe record a team's play-by-play performance deserved.

Records and stats cover FBS-vs-FBS games only — the games the model grades. Every number comes from a leak-checked walk-forward pipeline — no retroactive edits, no deleted picks. Picks grade against the closing line. Rate stats exclude garbage time (win probability outside 5–95%); turnovers are counted whole. Not betting advice.